Skip to content
Back to Top

Assistance to Environmentally Threatened Communities

Resources for Environmentally Threatened Communities

DCRA staff provides assistance to environmentally threatened communities in partnership with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Center for Environmentally Threatened Communities, the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Coastal Hazards Program, the Denali Commission Village Infrastructure Protection Program, and a number of other state and federal agencies and organizations. The focus is on the communities who were ranked highest for flood, erosion, permafrost degradation and combined threats in a 2019 Statewide Threat Assessment, as well the communities most impacted by Typhoon Merbok. DCRA staff assists these communities with local planning, coordination, as well as providing access to the broad range of local government resources DCRA has to offer.

Map of Environmentally Threatened Communities
Click to open interactive map of Environmentally Threatened Communities

The Communities

For information on community history, culture, economy, governance, critical infrastructure, natural hazard threats and current/proposed efforts to address each the natural hazards impacting each community, please explore the drop-down menu below.

Akiak

Akiak experiences severe riverine erosion, flooding, severe weather events, subsidence due to permafrost degradation, and wildland fire. Riverine erosion is Akiak’s greatest natural hazard threat. In May 2019, more than 75 feet of riverbank was lost in a single event along a mile-long stretch of the Kuskokwim River, resulting in the loss of several smokehouses and endangering residences. . In 2012, flooding eroded more than 150 feet of the community’s riverbank, resulting in the loss of the community’s original cemetery, fuel header protective embankment, and a house. As a result of this event, Akiak’s tribal and city governments jointly submitted a disaster declaration to the Governor of Alaska requesting disaster relief.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Akiak as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The USACE also selected Akiak for a Detailed Erosion Assessment. The assessment determined that Akiak was losing 31,900 square feet of land per year (.73 acres). The assessment projected that Akiak would lose an additional 37.33 acres of land with property damages totaling $373,000 and building damages totaling $4.5 million over a 50-year period of analysis. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Akiak as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. At the community’s request, Akiak will be prioritized for a new Risk MAP project in 2020.

Akiak Interagency Planning Meeting Agendas, Notes and Meeting Materials Akiak Low Earth Orbit Broadband Project Akiak Home Relocation and Managed Retreat Project
Akiak Community Plans Akiak Community Profile Maps Akiak Reports and Studies Akiak in the News
Alakanuk

Alakanuk is subject to severe storm events, flooding, river bank erosion and destabilization, and wildfires. Flooding and riverine erosion are significant hazard threats to Alakanuk. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has designated Alakanuk as a High-Flood Hazard Community, with the entire community vulnerable to the effects of flooding. Ice jams on the Yukon River frequently flood the community. In a 2013 flood event, flood water was two to three feet deep in some areas of the community. Three or four homes had water in them and the residents of these homes were evacuated. The sewage lagoon was inundated, and it was noted that some propane tanks were floating in town. The highest water level on record took place in 1952 when water flood water was approximately five feet deep in the highest part of the old village. In 1975, riverine erosion destroyed Alakanuk’s cannery and led to the relocation of many homes in the village. In 1993, 20 feet of bank eroded in one day.

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Alakanuk as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The USACE also selected Alakanuk for a detailed erosion assessment. The assessment determined that Alakanuk was losing 61,650 square feet per year (1.42 acres) along all seven river reaches. The assessment projected that Alakanuk would lose an additional 72.18 acres of land and property totaling $722,000 in damages over a 50-year period of analysis. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Alakanuk as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. Alakanuk was identified as highly vulnerable to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment. Alakanuk was prioritized for a new Risk MAP project in 2019.

For additional information on the village of Alakanuk, please visit the Alakanuk Risk MAP Study Page

Alakanuk Community Plans Alakanuk Community Profile Maps Alakanuk Reports and Studies Alakanuk in the News
Allakaket

Allakaket has experienced flooding and associated erosion caused by ice jams during spring snowmelt and from summer rainfall. Major flood events occurred in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1964, 1966, 1968, 1989, and 1994. The federally-declared 1994 Koyukuk Flood Disaster destroyed 17 homes, damaged 40 homes, and significantly damaged the community’s public facilities. Severe erosion occurred during this flood event. The damage was so extensive and severe that the community partially relocated on higher ground about 2 miles inland and uphill from the old location.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Allakaket as a Minimal Erosion Community in which the community has reported erosion impacts that are not serious and are not affecting the viability of the community. At this time, erosion does not appear to warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Allakaket as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. Allakaket was ranked as 6th most threatened by flooding, 10th most threatened by thawing permafrost, and 21stmost threatened by combined hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Allakaket Community Plans
  • Coming Soon!
Allakaket Community Profile Maps Allakaket Reports and Studies
  • Coming Soon!
Allakaket in the News
Atmautluak

Atmautluak environmental threat profile

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Atmautluak as a XX Action Communitysummary. Atmautluak was identified as RANK to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Atmautluak Community Plans Atmautluak Community Profile Maps Atmautluak Reports and Studies Atmautluak in the News
Bethel

Due to Bethel’s location on the largest oxbow curve in the Kuskokwim River, the community is highly susceptible to riverine erosion. The US Army Corps of Engineers built a seawall which has stabilized the Kuskokwim banks along the community and protects city dock and harbor infrastructure, residential and commercial buildings and the public road and utility poles nearby.

Bethel experiences flooding nearly annually, inundating 80 % of the community’s residential and commercial areas. The USACE has determined that most of Bethel is within the Special Flood Hazard Area, areas where the ground elevation is below 17.1 feet mean lower low water. Areas such as Brown’s Slough are the most flood prone and contain a high density of the residential development. During breakup, flooding is caused by ice jams, however in late summer and early fall, heavy rains can also flood Bethel. Poor drainage, frozen ground, permafrost, and low relief contribute to the flooding problems. The interaction of flooding and erosion have impacted community infrastructure in several events in 1985, 1990, 1995. The impacts of degrading permafrost in Bethel include surface subsidence, impacting roads , buildings and residences, resulting in costly projects to repair damage.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Bethel as a Monitor Conditions Community in which the community generally has reported significant impacts related to erosion but the impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The erosion issue may warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. Bethel was identified as 29th most threatened by eorsion, 12th most theateened by flood, 10th most threateend by thawing permafrost, and 19th most threatened by aggregated hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Bethel Community Plans Bethel Reports and Studies Bethel in the News
Chefornak

Chefornak experiences severe weather, erosion, flooding and subsidence due to permafrost degradation. Erosion poses the most significant threat to the community; however flooding and thawing permafrost contribute to the erosion threat. Chefornak experiences coastal erosion occurring along the shoreline of the Bering Sea and riverine erosion along the Kinia River embankment. Erosion of the Kinia River poses a particular threat to homes, the barge landing/jetty, bulk fuel tank farm and the Coastal Villages Region Fund Fisheries Support Center. Flood events at Chefornak have caused numerous problems in combination with erosion and thawing permafrost hazards. The introduction of floodwaters has increased thawing of the permafrost layer, causing settlement and failure of building foundations. Floodwaters have accelerated degradation of the remaining river bank and disrupted transportation to essential parts of the community. Thawing of the permafrost layer has caused subsidence, impacting the Head Start Building and utility poles.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Chefornak as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Chefornak as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. Chefornak was identified as highly vulnerable to erosion and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Chefornak Interagency Planning Meeting Agendas, Notes and Meeting Materials

Meeting 2 – October 4, 2019

Meeting 1 – February 21, 2018

Cherfornak Community Plans Chefornak Community Profile Maps Chefornak Reports and Studies Chefornak in the News
Chevak Circle

Circle is susceptible to severe road surface damage and erosion from heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and spring run-off. Ice jams and spring run-off flooding causes the most damages to the community. In 1989, property below the central part of the community was lost to significant erosion. Some residents lost 25 feet of property with erosion increased by seasonally high river levels. All the soils of the Circle vicinity are highly predisposed to frost heaving. Large areas of nearly level soils on the alluvial plains are underlain by permafrost, as are most of the soils in upland drainageways and depressions. Removal of the insulating organic mat causes thawing of the upper part of the permafrost.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Circle as a Monitor Conditions Community in which there are significant impacts related to erosion, but those impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Diomede as one of 184 Alaska Native Villages affected by flooding and erosion threats to some extent. In 2015, the State of Alaska declared an Economic Disaster in Diomede, Wales, Gambell and Savoonga due to a significant decline in walrus harvests attributed to a reduction in sea ice extent.

Circle Community Plans Circle Community Profile Maps Circle Reports and Studies Circle in the News
Deering

Deering experiences riverine and coastal erosion on an annual basis. In 2001, the shoreline eroded approximately 61 feet. During a 2006 event, the shoreline eroded approximately 50 feet.

Storm surges and wind-driven waves cause significant coastal flooding at least once every 40 to 60 years. Deering experiences flooding impacts annually; mostly due to tidally-influenced storm surge and riverine high-water flow events. A major flood in 1973 caused extensive damage to many homes and a number of residents were temporarily evacuated to a mining camp 22 miles upriver. During high floods events, the road provided ingress and egress to and from the village becomes blocked.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Circle as a Monitor Conditions Community in which there are significant impacts related to erosion, but those impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Diomede as one of 184 Alaska Native Villages affected by flooding and erosion threats to some extent. In 2015, the State of Alaska declared an Economic Disaster in Diomede, Wales, Gambell and Savoonga due to a significant decline in walrus harvests attributed to a reduction in sea ice extent.

Deering Community Plans Deering Community Profile Maps Deering Reports and Studies Deering in the News
Diomede

Diomede is subject to severe weather, erosion and coastal flooding, however a reduction in Bering Sea ice has most significantly impacted the community’s well-being and safety. One of the most remote communities in the United States, Diomede is located on the west coast of Little Diomede Island in the middle of the Bering Strait. The village has relied on shore-fast sea ice in the winter to provide a landing strip for planes transporting residents and delivering medicine and essential supplies. For generations, local hunters have relied upon sea ice to provide access to walrus, a main staple for Diomede families who depend largely on subsistence food from the ocean to survive. Recent changes in sea ice extent and weather patterns have severely decreased access to walrus and other subsistence resources, and limited air travel to helicopter service. A reduction in sea ice has made the village increasingly vulnerable to extreme weather events. Cyclonic and anti-cyclonic storms frequently create damaging ocean swells that batter the village. These events have damaged local utility and power plants resulting in loss of power to homes, the school, and the store. Diomede has been part of disaster declarations due to severe weather in 1990 and 2004 and for utility failure (water, power) in 1991, 2003 and 2013.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Chefornak as a Monitor Conditions Community in which there are significant impacts related to erosion, but those impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Diomede as one of 184 Alaska Native Villages affected by flooding and erosion threats to some extent. In 2015, the State of Alaska declared an Economic Disaster in Diomede, Wales, Gambell and Savoonga due to a significant decline in walrus harvests attributed to a reduction in sea ice extent.

Diomede Community Plans Diomede Community Profile Maps Diomede Reports and Studies
Diomede in the News
Eagle

Eagle is threatened by erosion, flooding, subsidence from thawing permafrost, severe weather and wildland fire. The 2009 Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment noted that ice jams from spring break-up are the primary cause of bank erosion in Eagle. The eroding area was estimated to be 1,690 feet in length with the height of the eroding bank estimated at 25 to 40 feet. Several residences, outbuildings, the community well house, community building, Front Road, the clinic, the tribal work force office, the church, and the remains of the historic school house were all threatened by the eroding river bank. Eagle experiences severe ice jam impact damages. Ice-jam impacts and subsequent flooding causes the most damages to the community’s infrastructure. The community has been part of ficer presidentially-declared disaster declarations.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Eagle as a Monitor Conditions Community in which the community generally has reported significant impacts related to erosion, but the impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The erosion issue may warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Eagle as one of 184 communities affected to some extent by erosion and flooding. The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Eagle as 3rd for flood threat, 17th for thawing permafrost threat, and 14th for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

Eagle Community Plans Diomede Community Profile Maps Eagle Reports and Studies Eagle in the News
Elim Emmonak

Emmonak is impacted by flooding, erosion and severe winter storm events. Emmonak is located on Kwiguk Pass, which is a vast tributary to the Yukon River. For years, the riverbank has continually eroded away after each spring thaw as debris, ice, and excess water continue to pound the shoreline. The community has previously placed rip rap to secure areas of the riverbank, but erosion continues further upstream as the banks are left exposed to the elements. Infrastructure within 300 feet of the riverbank is threatened by this erosion. Flooding in Emmonak is widespread. Multiple areas within the village will flood simultaneously due to the low-lying terrain throughout the community. In 2013, Emmonak was part of the Presidentially-Declared Disaster (DR-4122) due to ice jam flooding.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Emmonak as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Emmonak as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Emmonak as highly vulnerable to flooding and to all hazard threats (flood, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

For additional information on the village of Emmonak, please visit the Emmonak Risk MAP Study Page

Emmonak Community Plans Emmonak Community Profile Maps Emmonak Reports and Studies
Emmonak in the News
Fort Yukon

Fort Yukon is subject to flooding, riverine erosion, permafrost degradation, severe weather events and wildland fires. The community has a history of significant flooding of the Yukon and Porcupine Rivers which inundates most of the community. According to the USACE Floodplain Mapping and Data website, flooding in Fort Yukon occurs in mid-May during the breakup of the Yukon and Porcupine Rivers and is caused mainly by ice jams. The most damaging flood on record for Fort Yukon took place 1949 as a result of ice jams on the Porcupine River which resulted in 7-foot deep floodwaters in the community. In May 2015, a State Disaster Declaration was issued by then-Governor Walker for severe flooding at Fort Yukon which damaged roads and community infrastructure. In 2013, Fort Yukon was part of a Federal Disaster Declaration for spring floods that caused extensive damage to a communities along the Yukon River.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Fort Yukon as a Monitor Conditions Community in which there are significant impacts related to erosion, but those impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. Fort Yukon was identified as highly vulnerable to all hazards in aggregate (flood, erosion and permafrost degradation) in the 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Fort Yukon Community Plans Fort Yukon Community Profile Maps Fort Yukon Reports and Studies
Fort Yukon in the News
Galena

Galena is located on a floodplain along the Yukon River on flat land slightly above the elevation of the riverbank . The community is subject to ice jams and stream overflow flooding from the Yukon River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reported a high frequency of flooding and found Galena to be in a high flood hazard area. The 2013 Spring Ice Jam Flood (DR4122) established a new flood of record and was the worst flood in Galena’s history. Most of the community voluntarily evacuated to avoid serious injury. The Old Town section was completely destroyed by flood water and ice impacts. The New Town section was extensively damaged in similar manner. Approximately 194 homes were seriously damaged, uninhabitable, and must be completely rebuilt. Long term recovery efforts will continue through 2016. Galena experiences significant flooding and riverine erosion. Erosion is occurring all along the Yukon riverbank. During break-up, the thawed riverbank is water saturated and unstable allowing the swollen river to wash it away. The Yukon River has removed most of the river bank protecting Old Town and is continuing towards New Town.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Galena as a Monitor Conditions Communityin which the community generally has reported significant impacts related to erosion, but the impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The erosion issue may warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Galena as one of 184 communities that are affected to some extent by erosion and flooding. The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Galena as 8th for flood threat, 10th for thawing permafrost threat, and 16th for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

Galena Community Plans Galena Community Profile Maps Galena Reports and Studies Galena in the News
Golovin

Golovin experiences significant flooding, erosion, permafrost subsidence, severe storms and wildland fires. Storm surge flooding and erosion pose particular threats to the community. Golovin was included in Federally-Declared Disaster Declarations in 2005, 2011 and 2013, State of Alaska Disaster Declarations in 2004, 2005, 20111 and 2013 and historical local events in 1913, 1945 and 1946. In the flood of record in 1992, floodwater damaged public facilities and infrastructure.

In the 2009 Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment, Golovin was identified as a Priority Action Community indicating that the community should be considered for immediate action by either initiating an evaluation of potential solutions or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Golovin as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Golovin as one of eight imminently threatened villages that are likely to gradually migrate to a safer location over time. In the 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment, Golovin was identified as being highly vulnerable to flooding and erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Golovin Community Plans Golovin Community Profile Maps Golovin Reports and Studies
Golovin in the News
Hooper Bay Hughes

Historically, riverine erosion hazards have historically affected Hughes during each flood event due to high water flow rates and ice scouring. Erosion is influenced by flooding, spring break-up, ice scour, and thawing permafrost. The entire community of Hughes is susceptible to flood impacts. Most of the community’s structures are above the level of the certified highwater mark, however flooding in 1994 went beyond this level and inundated much of the lower City, including streets and residential structures. Similar flood events have been recorded in other years, including an event that occurred in 2006 when large portions of the community and community infrastructure, and several roads were inundated and eroded by high flow floodwaters.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Hughes as a Monitor Conditions Communityin which the community generally has reported significant impacts related to erosion, but the impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The erosion issue may warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. . The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Hughes as one of 31 communities facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Hughes as 7th for flood threat, 17th for thawing permafrost threat, and 15th for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

Hughes Community Plans Hughes Community Profile Maps Hughes Reports and Studies Hughes in the News
Huslia

Huslia is subject to erosion, severe weather, subsidence due to permafrost degradation and wildland fire. Riverine erosion is Huslia’s most serious natural hazard concern. The most active erosion area is at the 70-foot high bluff along 2,000 feet of the Koyukuk River adjacent to the village. Mass wasting has taken place along the bluff since 1974, particularly during spring break-up. Community infrastructure (power plant, gas and oil bulk fuel storage facility, water and sewer pipes) and homes have been relocated to avoid erosion damage. Single erosion events have been reported to cause as much as 80 feet of river bank to be lost along the 2,000-foot stretch adjacent to the village. In June 2014, high water in the Koyukuk River caused by heavy rainfall and snowmelt cause the loos of 70 feet of riverbank to erosion. In early June 2019, high water in the Koyukuk River threatened homes and infrastructure along the eroding riverbank.

In the 2009 Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment, Huslia was identified as a Priority Action Community indicating that the community should be considered for immediate action by either initiating an evaluation of potential solutions or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Huslia as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. In the 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment, Huslia was identified as being highly vulnerable to erosion, vulnerable to permafrost hazards and highly vulnerable using weighted scores.

Huslia Community Plans Huslia Community Profile Maps Huslia Reports and Studies
Huslia in the News
Kipnuk

Kipnuk environmental threat profile

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Kipnuk as a XX Action Communitysummary. Kipnuk was identified as RANK to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Kipnuk Community Plans Kipnuk Community Profile Maps Huslia Community Profile Maps Kipnuk Reports and Studies Kipnuk in the News
Kivalina

The barrier island on which Kivalina is located has long been subject to the processes of accretion and erosion. Residents of the community have expressed concerns about storm surges and erosion since soon after the community was first established. A longer ice-free period that makes the village vulnerable to dangerous fall storms. Storm events in 2004 and 2005 eroded the Chukchi Sea shoreline, threatening critical infrastructure and facilities including the community fuel tank farm, school and airstrip. Chronic erosion on the lagoon side of the island has threatened homes, which are in danger of falling into the lagoon. On the seaside of the island, fall storm surges create annual coastal flooding and beach erosion.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Kivalina as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Kivalina as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages identified as facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Kivalina as one of four imminently threatened villages likely to move all at once, as soon as possible.

For detailed information on the village of Kivalina, please visit the following webpages:

Kivalina Community Plans Kivalina Community Profile Maps Kivalina Reports and Studies
Kivalina in the News
Kotlik

Kotlik is impacted by erosion, flood, severe weather, subsidence due to permafrost degradation and wildland fire. Kotlik’s location makes the village susceptible to bank erosion in areas where community development has taken place, including the south bank of the Kotlik River, the north bank of the Kotlik River on East Island, and on the peninsula (i.e. West Island) between the Kotlik and Little Kotlik Rivers. Erosion of the bank of the Kotlik River has been actively occurring each year since at least the early 1980s as evidenced funding provided by the State of Alaska and the US Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s for an erosion control study, a coastal erosion study, a preliminary design and assessment and more the one million dollars in appropriations for erosion control.

From 2008 to 2011, Kivalina was one of six imminently-threatened communities on which the Alaska Governor’s Immediate Action Work Group focused. In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Kotlik as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Kotlik as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages identified as facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Kotlik as highly vulnerable to erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

For additional information on the village of Kotlik, please visit the Kotlik Risk MAP Study Page

Kotlik Community Plans Kotlik Community Profile Maps Kotlik Reports and Studies Kotlik in the News
Koyuk Kwigillingok

Kwigillingok environmental threat profile

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Kwigillingok as a XX Action Communitysummary. Kwigillingok was identified as RANK to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Kwigillingok Community Plans Kwigillingok Community Profile Maps Kwigillingok Reports and Studies Kwigillingok in the News
McGrath

McGrath experiences flood, erosion, severe weather, subsidence due to permafrost degradation, and wildland fire. Flooding causes the greatest threat to the community. McGrath’s location on the inside of an oxbow on the Kuskokwim River makes the village vulnerable to ice jams and stream overflow flooding from the Kuskokwim River. Flooding is a regular occurrence in McGrath; there has been significant flood events nearly every decade since the 1920s, with the most damaging event taking place in 1991 when 65 structures were inundated, and a State Disaster was declared with Preliminary Damage Assessments of more than $2 million for Individual Assistance and $7.4 million in total Public Assistance for damage to buildings and equipment. McGrath was included in Federally-Declared Disasters in 2002 (DR-1423), 2005 (AK-05-213), and 2009 (DR-1843). McGrath is also threatened by erosion, which is occurring all along the Kuskokwim riverbank. During spring break-up, the thawed riverbank is especially vulnerable to erosion. There are currently 21 residences; 17 various structures, such as sheds and workshops; 10 commercial buildings; and over 21 public structures and infrastructure within 100 feet of the eroding river bank.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Napakiak as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Napakiak as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages identified as facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Napakiak as highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

McGrath Community Plans McGrath Community Profile Maps McGrath Reports and Studies
McGrath in the News
Napakiak

Napakiak is subject to erosion, flooding, land subsidence due to permafrost degradation and severe weather. Erosion of the Kuskokwim River bank is Napakiak’s most imminent threat. Erosion been on-going since the 1960s and has been forecast by the US Army Corps of Engineers to be 25-50 feet per year. 2018 trip reports by the Natural Resources conservation Service and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium indicate that erosion rates had increased after spring break-up. The community has been actively pursuing the relocation of infrastructure, public buildings, residences and fish camps since the mid-1990s. Community members recently moved the threatened armory building.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Napakiak as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The USACE also selected Napakiak for a detailed erosion assessment. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Napakiak as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages identified as facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Napakiak as highly vulnerable to flood, erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Napakiak Interagency Planning Meeting Agendas, Notes and Meeting Materials Napakiak Community Plans Napakiak Community Profile Maps Napakiak Reports and Studies
Napakiak in the News
Napaskiak

The entire community of Napaskiak and the surrounding area is located within the floodplain of the Kuskokwim River. There is no high ground in the immediate vicinity. Flooding at Napaskiak results from river overflow due to spring ice jams along the Kuskokwim River. The US Army Corps of Engineers has described the entire area as a "very high flood hazard." According to studies, the morphology of the sloughs that run past Napaskiak suggest that erosion will increase as time progresses. The US Army Corps of Engineers Detailed Erosion Assessment noted that northeast of Napaskiak is a small slough that feeds into Tupuknuk Slough. From aerial and surface photography, it appears that the thalweg of the Kuskokwim River is beginning to run into this slough which could explain why the depth of the slough is increasing. The initial breach reportedly occurred in 2005 and the Kuskokwim River is moving between 10 and 15 feet a year towards this slough. The Kuskokwim River is approximately 60 feet deep at the bend where the breach occurs. As the thalweg of the Kuskokwim meanders, flow through this small slough will increase causing the channel to widen and deepen. Warming temperatures have led to thawing permafrost in the Kuskokwim area. Thawing permafrost can cause severe subsidence, which constrains development of resources, transportation and utility systems, and community expansion.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Napaskiak as a Minimal Erosion Communityin which reported erosion impacts that are not serious and are not affecting the viability of the community. At the time, erosion did not appear to warrant Federal, State, or other intervention. The 2003/2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Napaskiak as one of 184 communities who were affected to some extent by erosion and flooding. The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Napaskiak as 7th for flood threat, 19th for thawing permafrost threat, and 23rd for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

Napaskiak Community Plans Napaskiak Community Profile Maps Napaskiak Reports and Studies Napaskiak in the News
Newtok

Newtok is threatened by erosion, flooding, severe weather and subsidence due to permafrost degradation. Impacted by severe erosion since the 1980s, Newtok was advised that relocation would be more feasible than protecting-in-place over the long-term. The community made the decision to relocate in the early 1990s and in 2003, after a lengthy negotiation process, Newtok Native Corporation completed a land exchange with the federal government for land on the north side of Nelson Island known as Mertarvik. The community has actively pursued relocation to Mertarvik since 2006. In October 2019, approximately one-third of Newtok’s current population will move permanently to Mertarvik, a major milestone in the village relocation effort.

Severe erosion has set in motion a range of adverse impacts to the community’s safety and well-being. Loss of the land buffer separating Newtok and the Ninglick River has made the village extremely vulnerable to storms moving in to the Ninglick River from the Bering Sea. Flooding and storm surges have become much more frequent in recent years. Erosion has claimed critical infrastructure such as Newtok’s barge landing, boat docks and solid waste site. Sediment from the eroding Ninglick River has infilled the one remaining point of water access to the community, subverting barge access and impeding delivery of critical supplies, fuel and food. Newtok residents, particularly the very young and elderly, are experiencing significant public health problems because there is no proper way to handle human or solid waste. Erosion threatens the lake providing Newtok’s potable water. When this is lost, there will be a public health crisis in Newtok.

From 2008 to 2011, Newtok was one of six imminently-threatened communities on which the Alaska Governor’s Immediate Action Work Group focused. In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Newtok as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Newtok as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Newtok as one of four imminently threatened villages likely to move all at once, as soon as possible. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Newtok as highly vulnerable to flood and permafrost-related hazards, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Newtok Community Plans Newtok Community Profile Maps

For detailed information on the village of Newtok, please visit the Newtok Planning Group Website

Nightmute Nunam Iqua Point Lay

Point Lay (Coming Soon)

Point Lay Research and Project Advisory Group Quarterly Meetings Point Lay Community Plans Point Lay Community Profile Maps Point Lay Reports and Studies Point Lay in the News
Quinhagak

Quinhagak environmental threat profile

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Quinhagak as a XX Action Communitysummary. Quinhagak was identified as RANK to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Quinhagak Community Plans Quinhagak Community Profile Maps Quinhagak Reports and Studies Quinhagak in the News
Scammon Bay St. Michael

Saint Michael experiences storm surge, thawing permafrost, later-forming coastal ice, and wind-driven storm surge-coastal erosion along the shoreline adjacent to Norton Sound and Saint Michael Bay and the use of the beaches and banks by ATVs and pedestrians along Saint Michael’s Bay. According to the Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment, coastal erosion covers an area of approximately 1 to 2 miles long and 10 feet high at Saint Michael, with an erosion rate of approximately 3 feet per year. The north end of the airstrip is protected by riprap; however the remaining unprotected beach continues to erode. Saint Michael experiences coastal flooding from storm surges, especially during the fall storm season and when storm events occur during high tides. Saint Michael also experiences severe weather events. The primary threats are annual weather patterns, severe cold, heavy rain, freezing rain, snow accumulations, storm surge, and wind. During severe weather events, intense wind and severe cold are the main threats to the community. Severe weather events cause fuel price increases and frozen pipes, resulting in the loss of sewer service for many residents. High winds can remove or damage roofs and down power lines.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified St. Michael as a Priority Action Communityin which the community should be considered for immediate action by either initiating an evaluation of potential solutions or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2003/2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified St. Michael as one of 31 Alaskan communities facing imminent flooding and erosion problems. The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified St. Michael as 8th for erosion threat; 4th for thawing permafrost threat, and 18th for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

St. Michael Community Plans St. Michael Community Profile Maps St. Michael Community Profile Maps St. Michael Reports and Studies St. Michael in the News
Savoonga

Savoonga is threatened by erosion, flooding, subsidence due to permafrost degradation and severe weather. Coastal erosion threatens community infrastructure, facilities and buildings. Savoonga’s location on Saint Lawrence Island in the middle of the Bering Sea makes it especially vulnerable to serve weather. A reduction in the extent of Bering Sea ice has added to Savoonga’s vulnerability because the sea ice serves as a buffer against the effects of sea storms. Savoonga has Been impacted by a number of sever storm events. Most recently, a Presidentially-Declared Disaster was made in 2016, when sea storm bearing hurricane-force winds damaged approximately 30 homes and a number of public facilities in Savoonga. The community lost power and 90 residents had to shelter at the village school.

In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Savoonga as a Monitor Conditions Community in which there are significant impacts related to erosion, but those impacts are not likely to affect the viability of the community. The 2003 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Savoonga as one of 184 Alaska Native Villages affected by flooding and erosion to some extent. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Savoonga as highly vulnerable to all hazard using weighted scores, highly vulnerable to erosion, and vulnerable to permafrost related hazards.

Savoonga Community Plans Savoonga Community Profile Maps Savoonga Reports and Studies
Savoonga in the News
Shaktoolik

Shaktoolik experiences erosion, flooding and severe weather. The community’s location leaves it vulnerable to erosion when fall storms hit the sand and gravel spit where the village is located. There is no breakwater to protect the village from destructive waves from Norton Sound when storms come from the south. Considerable coastline erosion in the community occurred during recent storms in 2003, 2004, and 2005.

Most of the Shaktoolik community and surrounding area lie within the 100-year floodplain. The village is extremely vulnerable to coastal sea storms. Erosion during flooding damaged the village airstrip so extensively it was replaced. In October 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers completed a coastal flooding analysis of Shaktoolik. The analysis indicated that in a 1% (or 100-year) flood event, the storm water level would overtop the entire community. There are no structures in the village with a finished flood elevation higher than the 100-year storm level.

From 2008 to 2011, Shaktoolik was one of six imminently-threatened communities on which the Alaska Governor’s Immediate Action Work Group focused. In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Shaktoolik as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The USACE also selected Shaktoolik for a detailed erosion assessment. The assessment determined that Shaktoolik was losing 38,300 square feet of land per year (.88 acres). The assessment projected that Shaktoolik would lose an additional 44.84 acres of land with property damages totaling $448,000 and building damages totaling $9.8 million over a 50-year period of analysis.

The 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Shaktoolik as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Shaktoolik as one of four imminently threatened villages likely to move all at once, as soon as possible. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Shaktoolik as highly vulnerable to flood, erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Shaktoolik Community Plans Shaktoolik Community Profile Maps

For detailed information on the village of Shaktoolik, please visit the following webpages:

Shishmaref

Shishmaref is subject to erosion, flooding and severe weather. Shishmaref’s primary erosion hazards are wave and slough erosion, sea ice gouging, and slumping resulting from melting permafrost. Erosion has undermined buildings and infrastructure, causing several structures to collapse and fall into the sea. Over the years, the community has tried many different techniques to arrest the erosion, including gabions, sandbags, and articulated concrete mats. All these efforts have provided only temporary solutions. Because the shoreline continues to recede, the community has moved houses and other structures back from the edge but has less and less space to do so. According to the local hazard mitigation plan, “the effects of climate change are expected to add to natural hazards including flooding in coastal areas. As sea level rises and the offshore ice pack retreats, more coastal flooding can be expected.”

The community has experienced a number of severe coastal storms over the past 20 years that eroded the island to such an extent that the viability of the community is at risk. In October 1997, a severe storm eroded over 30 feet of the north shore, requiring 14 homes and the National Guard Armory to be relocated. Five additional homes were relocated in 2002. Other storms have continued to erode the shoreline an average of three to five feet per year on the north shore.

From 2008 to 2011, Shishmaref was one of six imminently-threatened communities on which the Alaska Governor’s Immediate Action Work Group focused. In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Shishmaref as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Shishmaref as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Shishmaref as one of four imminently threatened villages likely to move all at once, as soon as possible. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Shishmaref as highly vulnerable to flood, erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Shishmaref Community Plans Shishmaref Community Profile Maps

For detailed information on the village of Shishmaref, please visit the following webpages:

Stebbins

Stebbins environmental threat profile

In 2009, the USACE Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Stebbins as a XX Action Communitysummary. Stebbins was identified as RANK to flooding and highly vulnerable for all hazards (erosion, flood, permafrost degradation) in aggregate in the 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment.

Stebbins Community Plans Stebbins Community Profile Maps Stebbins Reports and Studies Stebbins in the News
Tuluksak

Snowmelt and ice jam flooding in Tuluksak occurs during spring thaw and the fall rainy season. Events occur from soil saturation. Tuluksak has experienced severe damages from heavy rainfall, snowmelt, spring run-off, and ice jam flooding. Spring run-off causes the most damages. The airport, residential structures, fish camps and other community infrastructure have been damaged or destroyed by these events. According to the Tuluksak community, a sandbar in Kuskokwim River directs River water force directly towards the community’s embankment which causes consistent erosion and substantial embankment loss.

The 2019 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Tuluksak as 5th for flood threat, 17th for thawing permafrost threat, and 20th for combined threats (erosion, flooding, thawing permafrost) in aggregate.

Tuluksak Community Plans Tuluksak Community Profile Maps Tuluksak Reports and Studies Tuluksak in the News
Unalakleet

Unalakleet is threatened by flooding, erosion, severe weather and wildland fire. The entire community of Unalakleet is at risk of flooding and the coastal area is at risk of storm surges and wave scouring. The community has been included in several State and Federally-Declared Disasters over the past two decades: 2003 Fall Sea Storm (AK-04-209) Declared January 29, 2004, 2004 Bering Strait Sea Storm declared October 28, 2004 by the State of Alaska then federally declared (DR-1571) on November 15, 2004, and 2005 West Coast Storm declared October 24, 2005 by the State of Alaska then federally declared (DR-1618) on December 9, 2005. The community s impacted by erosion on both the ocean side (Norton Sound) and from the Unalakleet River.

From 2008 to 2011, Unalakleet was one of six imminently-threatened communities on which the Alaska Governor’s Immediate Action Work Group focused. In 2009, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment identified Shishmaref as a Priority Action Community in which erosion is threatening the viability of the community, significant resources are being expended to minimize such threats, or both conditions are present, and the community should be considered for immediate action in either initiating an investigation or continuing with ongoing efforts to manage erosion. The 2009 Government Accountability Office Report on Flooding and Erosion in Alaska Native Villages identified Unalakleet as one of 31 Alaska Native Villages facing imminent flooding and erosion threats. The GAO report also identified Unalakleet as one of 12 imminently threatened villages that are exploring relocation options. The 2018 Alaska Statewide Threat Assessment identified Unalakleet as highly vulnerable to erosion, and highly vulnerable to all threats (flooding, erosion, permafrost degradation) in aggregate.

Unalakleet Community Plans Unalakleet Community Profile Maps Unalakleet Reports and Studies Unalakleet in the News
Utqiagvik

*The village of Diomede was included by DCRA as a 27th community because the village's access, viability and food security are being threatened due to a reduction in sea ice, a hazard that was not considered in the Statewide Threat Assessment


DCRA's Community Resilience Programs

For more information contact:

Sally Russell Cox

Division of Community and Regional Affairs
Community Resilience Programs
Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1640, Anchorage, AK 99501-3569
Phone (907) 269-4588 Fax (907)269-4539
Email: sally.cox@alaska.gov

Revised 12/6/2023